The 2012 Volvo S60 is one of only two vehicles tested to achieve an overall rating of “Good” in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's new small overlap frontal crash test.
In the test, 25% of a car’s front end on the driver side strikes a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 64 km/h. The test is designed to replicate what happens when the front corner of a car collides with another vehicle or an object like a tree or utility pole. Outside of some automakers’ proving grounds, such a test isn’t currently conducted anywhere else in the United States or Europe.
“Nearly every new car performs well in other frontal crash tests conducted by the Institute and the federal government,” says IIHS president Adrian Lund. “But we still see more than 10,000 deaths in frontal crashes each year.”
“Small overlap crashes are a major source of these fatalities,” he adds. “This new test program is based on years of analyzing real-world frontal crashes and then replicating them in our crash test facility to determine how people are being seriously injured and how cars can be designed to protect them better. We think this is the next step in improving frontal crash protection.”
You can find the full report on the IIHS website.
Take a look at some of the actual crash test videos recorded during the IIHS New Small Overlap Frontal Crash Tests.
Some excerpts from the IIHS’s Press Release include:
- The Acura TL and Volvo S60 earned good ratings, while the Infiniti G earned an acceptable rating. The Acura TSX, BMW 3 series, Lincoln MKZ and Volkswagen CC earned marginal ratings. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Lexus IS 250/350, Audi A4 and Lexus ES 350 all earned poor ratings. All of these cars are 2012 models.
- Structurally, the Volvo S60 was best. With only a few inches of intrusion, the occupant compartment looked much the same as it did in a moderate overlap test. Reinforcement of the S60’s upper rails and a steel cross member below the instrument panel helped to keep the safety cage intact. Volvo has performed similar small overlap tests as part of its vehicle safety development process since the late 1980s, taking the results into account when designing new models.
- Survival space for the driver wasn’t well maintained in the Lexus IS crash test. The A-pillar bent and the footwell collapsed as the left front wheel and tire were forced rearward. The dummy’s feet were entrapped by intruding structures. Results for the Volvo S60 were very different. The S60’s occupant compartment held up well, with only minor intrusion. Comparatively, the Lexus IS had up to 10 times as much intrusion into the occupant compartment as the Volvo.