Governance

Our sustainability strategy is fully integrated into our corporate strategy and is challenged frequently by regular internal analysis, including climate- and nature-related risks and opportunities. We have a governance structure in place to monitor the progress of our sustainability strategy, ambitions and initiatives.

A man observing a woman working on a smart board with a stylus.

How are we organized?

Our sustainability governance structure is organized according to the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This means we conduct frequent sustainability reviews at each management level including Board of Directors. The global sustainability team oversees the development and progress of the sustainability strategy across the company.

The organization

Board of Directors (BoD)

Our BoD sets the strategic direction and approves our strategy, including sustainability and follows up progress. Our climate action plan with its risks and opportunities is discussed at the regular BOD meetings.

Executive Management Team (EMT)

The EMT is responsible for the overall governance, execution and implementation of the sustainability strategy and regularly monitors progress through several KPIs. The climate action plan with risks and opportunities is reviewed quarterly.

Global Sustainability Team (GST)

The GST is centrally responsible for the day-to-day governance and coordination of sustainability. It develops and refines the sustainability strategy, leads and supports the strategic initiatives and follows up on the progress of our KPIs. It also gathers business intelligence on sustainability matters.

Green Finance Committee (GFC)

The GFC reviews and validates the selection of the Eligible Green Projects and reviews the EU Taxonomy Report.

Line of business

Functional management teams are responsible for ensuring that sustainability becomes an integrated part of everyone’s daily work. They are sounding boards for the GST members and can be requested to secure resources and funding for sustainability initiatives.

ESG reporting

We believe in external third-party validation of our sustainability performance. It's essential to gaining credibility. It's reassurance to our people and external stakeholders that our sustainability strategy and our ambitions support global goals, such as the UN SDGs and the Paris Agreement.

S&P: Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment

Logo of S&P Global.

S&P: Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment

Volvo Cars scored 67/100 in the 2024 Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) by ratings provider S&P Global, known for its highly stringent sustainability ratings. This placed Volvo Cars among the top 5 best performing companies that year for environmental, social and corporate governance within the automotive industry. Interval: 1-100.

Learn about S&P Global

CDP: Climate Change A List and Supplier Engagement Leader

A logo of CDP disclosure insight action A list 2021.

CDP: Climate Change A List and Supplier Engagement Leader

We are one of only 362 companies that made CDP's Climate Change A List (from 21,000 scored), and received its highest rating. Based on our CDP result, we were also acknowledged as a Supplier Engagement Leader in recognition of our climate action within our supply chain. Interval: D- to A

Learn about CDP

EcoVadis: Gold

A logo of Ecovadis platinum top one percent.

EcoVadis: Gold

Volvo Cars received the rating Gold (score 77/100) for its sustainability performance from EcoVadis, a leading provider of corporate sustainability assessments for global supply chains. This places Volvo Cars among the top 5 per cent of the assessed companies. Interval: 0-100

Learn about Ecovadis

Our collaboration partners

We're committed to reduce our impact on the planet and that takes a global effort. Collaborating with companies, organizations, and NGOs is vital to drive industry change and performance. A few examples:

Climate-related risks and global warming scenarios

From a world economic point of view, climate change is a top risk both in terms of impact and likelihood. It affects our company and our industry in many ways.

We analyze different global warming scenarios in accordance with TCFD recommendations to verify the resilience of our strategy. We used IEA's Stated Policies Scenario (4DS) and Sustainability Development Scenario (<2DS) for analyzing Transitional Risks and IPCC's 8.5 Scenario for analyzing Physical Risks. By analyzing impact and likelihood in these different scenarios, we not only identified risks that affect our company, but also opportunities.

For reporting on Volvo Cars' climate-related financial risks, in accordance with CARB SB-261, we refer to Volvo Cars Annual and Sustainability Report 2024.

Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

We are a TCFD supporter and report according to TCFDs eleven recommended disclosures since Annual Report 2020.